Section 29

Absence of Judge before conclusion of proceedings

ActIn forceProvision 32 of 35

Where a Judge of an Intermediate Court is prevented for any reason whatsoever from concluding any proceeding, whether in the exercise of the criminal or civil jurisdiction of the court, any other Judge of an Intermediate

Court may, with the consent of the parties, proceed therewith and may give judgment therein, and in so doing, may act not only upon any further evidence adduced in the proceedings but also upon any evidence already received in so far as it had been recorded.

His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan not compellable to attend

Read in full context — Intermediate Courts Act →

Section 29

Absence of Judge before conclusion of proceedings

of Intermediate Courts Act

ActIn forceProvision 32 of 35

Where a Judge of an Intermediate Court is prevented for any reason whatsoever from concluding any proceeding, whether in the exercise of the criminal or civil jurisdiction of the court, any other Judge of an Intermediate

Court may, with the consent of the parties, proceed therewith and may give judgment therein, and in so doing, may act not only upon any further evidence adduced in the proceedings but also upon any evidence already received in so far as it had been recorded.

His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan not compellable to attend

Read in full context — Intermediate Courts Act →