Section 124
of Criminal Asset Recovery Order, 2012
Section 124
(1)
If proceedings have been instituted against a person for an offence or offences to which this Order applies and either –
Incorporating amendments until S 22/2017
(Cleancopy) NHN/Amiriah/Bb/Karimah as of 26.12.2019
*Note: amendment on page 7,75,81,123 on 11.01.2020
121
BLUV as at 11th March 2017
(a)
the proceedings have not resulted in his conviction for any such offence;
or
(b)
where he was convicted of one or more such offences; and
(c)
the conviction or convictions have been quashed; or
(d)
His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan has granted a pardon in respect of the conviction or convictions, the High Court may, on an application by any person who held property which was realisable property, order compensation to be paid to the applicant out of the Fund if having regard to all circumstances, it considers it appropriate to make such an order.
(2)
The High Court shall not order compensation to be paid in any case unless it is satisfied that –
(a)
there has been some serious default on the part of a person concerned in the investigation or prosecution of the offence or offences; and
(b)
the applicant has suffered loss in consequence of anything done in relation to the property by or in pursuance of an order under this Order.
(3)
The High Court shall not order compensation to be paid in any case where it appears to the Court that the proceedings would have been instituted or continued even if the serious default had not occurred.
(4)
The amount of compensation to be paid under this section shall be such as the
Court thinks just in all the circumstances of the case.
Notice or order not to be invalid for error in description.